Hyphens are a pain. They demand attention to hard-to-understand rules. They are hard to love.
James Joyce decided unilaterally to get rid of hyphens
altogether, but then he used them instead of inverted commas to indicate
speech. So he was no help, really. It would be nice if they went away, but they
won’t, so let’s deal with them.
The rule is this: if you are running two or more adverbs,
adjectives or nouns together to forge a single concept, then hyphenate them to
show that they belong together. Do this when the words are in the adjectival
position (before the noun).
So, you might say in reference to an unpleasant baby, a
hard-to-please, three-year-old, blue-faced, bad-tempered, spoilt little monster. But you would also say, Wow, that child is hard to please. In the second sentence, the
words are not melded into a single adjective; in the first, they are.
He is a soft-headed,
happy-go-lucky, exam-dodging student.
She is a
sweet-natured, hard-working, quick-thinking grammar queen.
You might justifiably say
that this is not a very
interesting topic, and I agree.
You might also say, pushing the limits of
style a little, that this is a
not-very-interesting topic.
Why? Because I changed the position of the
“not” (an adverb) in the sentence, making it, in the second, part of a (rather
awkward) adjectival phrase.
I still do not understand the proper use of hyphens or when they are meant to be used.
ReplyDeleteHow would we use spoilt as opposed to spoiled?
ReplyDeleteHow would we use spoilt as opposed to spoiled?
ReplyDelete